ROSSLOW PETITIONER v. MULCREVY CLERK OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RESPONDENT (1934)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

A. F. ROSSLOW, PETITIONER, v. H. I. MULCREVY, CLERK OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, RESPONDENT.

Civ. 9358.

Decided: January 29, 1934

H. C. Burnhill and Francis Gill, of San Francisco, for petitioner. Frank V. Kington, of San Francisco, for respondent.

Petition for mandate to compel respondent to issue execution on a judgment.

The facts are stated in the opinion in Rosslow v. Janssen (Cal. App.) 29 P. (2d) 287, this day decided. Upon the authority of that case, the petition is denied.

TYLER, Presiding Justice.

We concur: KNIGHT, J.; CASHIN, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network