LOS ANGELES SURETY COMPANY INC CORPORATION PETITIONER AND APPELLANT v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

LOS ANGELES SURETY COMPANY, INC. (A CORPORATION), PETITIONER AND APPELLANT, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

Civ. 8192.

Decided: January 12, 1934

A. Brigham Rose, of Los Angeles, for appellant. Charles P. Johnson, City Prosecutor, and John L. Bland and Joe W. Matherly, Deputy City Prosecutors, all of Los Angeles, for respondents.

In the above–entitled cause the petitioner sought in the superior court a writ of audita querela to compel the municipal court to set aside an order forfeiting bail and entering judgment, which petition was denied. From the latter ruling the petitioner appealed.

The questions here presented having been determined in considering controversies between the same parties adversely to the appellants, their discussion is not further required. Los Angeles Surety Co. v. Municipal Court, 111 Cal. App. 133, 295 P. 591; Eureka Casualty Co. v. Municipal Court (Cal. App.) 28 P.(2d) 709.

The order is affirmed.

CRAIG, Justice.

We concur: STEPHENS, P. J.; ARCHBALD, Justice, pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network