QUINN v. RECREATION PARK ASSOCIATION (1934)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

Joan QUINN (a minor), by Aloysius W. Quinn, her Guardian ad Litem; Frances Quinn and Aloysius W. Quinn, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RECREATION PARK ASSOCIATION (a Corporation), San Francisco Baseball Club, Inc. (a Corporation), Pittsburgh Baseball Club (a Corporation) and Gussie Suhr, Defendants; San Francisco Baseball Club, Inc. (a Corporation) and Gussie Suhr, Respondents.

Civ. 9123.

Decided: September 12, 1934

George D. Collins, Jr., of San Francisco, for appellants. Jesse H. Steinhart and John J. Goldberg, both of San Francisco, for respondent San Francisco Baseball Club, Inc. Robert P. Cahen and Vogelsang & Brown, all of San Francisco, for respondent Gussie Suhr.

For the reasons and upon the grounds set forth in the main opinion (35 P.(2d) 602) this day filed in the above-entitled cause, the motion of respondent Suhr to affirm the judgment is granted.

KNIGHT, Justice.

We concur: TYLER, P. J.; CASHIN, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network