Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WHOLESALE TOBACCO DEALERS BUREAU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Incorporated (a California Nonprofit Corporation), Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATIONAL CANDY & TOBACCO CO. (a California Corporation) et al., Defendants; National Candy & Tobacco Co. (a California Corporation), Defendant and Appellant.†
This cause was consolidated with the case of Everett L. Balzer v. Donald L. Caler, Cal.App., 74 P.2d 839, for the purpose of presenting to this court the appeals.
This is an appeal from a judgment which was rendered in favor of the plaintiff by another trial judge of Los Angeles county, enjoining the defendants from selling, offering for sale, or advertising for sale, specified tobaccos and merchandise for less than invoice or replacement cost to the vendors, contrary to the provisions of section 3 of the Unfair Competition Act of California. Stats.1913, pp. 508, 509, as amended in 1935 at pages 1546, 1548, Deering's Supp. of 1935, pp. 2063, 2064, Act 8781. This cause presents precisely the same issue which were determined in the case of Balzer v. Caler, 74 P.2d 839, an opinion in which was this day filed by this court. The circumstances of the two cases are identical. The opinion in the case last cited determines all the issues on this appeal.
On the authority of the case of Balzer v. Caler, supra, the judgment in this case is reversed, and the court is directed to render judgment in favor of the defendant.
Mr. Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the court.
We concur: PULLEN, P. J.; PLUMMER, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 5936.
Decided: December 18, 1937
Court: District Court of Appeal, Third District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)