IN RE: HARRIS' ESTATE.† (1937)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

IN RE: HARRIS' ESTATE.† HARRIS et al. v. LARTER et al.

Civ. 1663.

Decided: March 16, 1937

W. M. Greathouse and C. E. McDowell, both of Los Angeles, and Head, Wellington & Jacobs and Otto A. Jacobs, all of Santa Ana, for appellants. R. Y. Williams and Charles D. Swanner, both of Santa Ana, for respondents.

In a petition for rehearing the appellants refer to the statement in the opinion that the court had found that eight parcels of real property were acquired by Mrs. Harris after the death of her husband, and state that the finding in question refers to seven parcels only and that this court has mistakenly included “parcel 3” in the real property thus acquired by Mrs. Harris. While the finding referred to covers eight pieces of property, it does not mention “parcel 3” and that parcel was not specially considered in the opinion since no point was raised in connection therewith.

The petition for a rehearing is denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network