SPRINGER v. ANGELES CREDIT CO LIMITED ET AL (1941)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

SPRINGER v. ANGELES CREDIT CO., LIMITED, ET AL.

Civ. 12967.

Decided: May 07, 1941

Dailey S. Stafford and William H. Haupt, both of Los Angeles, for appellant. J. Everett Blum and John Moore Robinson, both of Los Angeles (Ralph W. Smith, of Los Angeles, of counsel), for respondents.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has not filed points and authorities within the time prescribed by law (see Rule V, sec. 1, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, 213 Cal. XLIII).

The facts are:

February 16, 1940, appellant filed his notice of appeal. June 1, 1940, he filed a clerk's transcript. Since that time appellant has not filed his printed points and authorities, nor has he obtained an extension of time within which to file the same. Section 4, Rule I of Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal provides that such points and authorities shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the transcript. Therefore, since appellant has failed to comply with the requirements of the last mentioned rule, his appeal should be (Cleghorn v. Hegarty, 22 Cal.App.2d 208, 70 P.2d 679) and it is hereby dismissed.

McCOMB, Justice.

We concur: MOORE, P. J.; WOOD, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network