Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BLASE MASON, Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
Blase Mason Edward Velasquez appeals from a July 28, 2010 order denying his post-judgment motion for additional presentence conduct credits. (Pen.Code, § 4019.) 1
On July 30, 2009, an information was filed charging appellant with grand theft (§ 487, subd. (a)) and second degree burglary (§ 459). It was alleged that appellant had suffered a prior strike conviction in 1983 for first degree burglary (§ 1170.12, subds.(a) -(d); 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and a prior prison term based on a 2002 burglary conviction (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).
On September 18, 2009, appellant pled nolo cotendre to grand theft and waived time for sentencing. Pursuant to the negotiated plea, he was sentenced to three years state prison and awarded 93 days presentence custody credit and 46 days conduct credit.
Appellant did not appeal from the conviction.
On May 24, 2010 and July 26, 2010 appellant filed post-judgment motions for additional presentence conduct credits and 32 days post-sentence credits based on an amendment of section 4019 that became effective January 25, 2010. (Stats.2009, 3d Ex.Sess.2009, ch. 28, § 50.) The trial court denied the motions on the ground that appellant's conviction was final as of September 18, 2009 and on the ground that appellant was not eligible for additional credits.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After examining the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On December 6, 2010, we advised appellant that he had 30 days to personally submit any contentions he wished us to consider. No response has been received.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443.)
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
We concur:
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lernnon, Staff Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
FOOTNOTES
FN1. All statutory references are to the Penal Code.. FN1. All statutory references are to the Penal Code.
GILBERT, P.J. PERREN, J. Clifford L. Klein, Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2d Crim. No. B227062
Decided: February 14, 2011
Court: Court of Appeal, Second District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)