THE PEOPLE v. SAMUEL CASTRO (2010)

Court of Appeal, Second District, California.

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAMUEL CASTRO, Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B214129

Decided: June 23, 2010

Court Security Fee Required

Respondent asserts that the trial court erred by failing to impose a court security fee as to each offense as is required by section 1465.8, subdivision (a)(1). (See People v. Schoeb (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 861, 865-866.) Castro tacitly concedes and we agree. We will therefore order a modification in the abstract of judgment to include the required court security fee of $60, consisting of $20 for each of the three counts for which Castro was convicted.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

PERREN, J.

We concur:

YEGAN, Acting P.J.

COFFEE, J.

Douglas W. Daily, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

Robert Diamond for Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jaime L. Fuster, Rama R. Maline, and Dana M. Ali, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network