RE BECK v. NEVILLE (2022)

GREETINGS:

The following action was taken by the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona on December 6, 2022, in regard to the above-referenced cause:

ORDERED: Petition for Review = GRANTED.

FURTHER ORDERED: The case shall be set for oral argument.

FURTHER ORDERED: The parties may file simultaneous supplemental briefs, not to exceed 20 pages in length, no later than 20 days from the date of this Court's Minute Letter. Any amicus briefs are due on or before January 11, 2023 and any responses to amicus briefs are due on or before February 1, 2023. Any amicus briefs or responses may not exceed 20 pages in length.

FURTHER ORDERED: Request for Attorneys' Fees (Appellees Beck et al) = CONTINUED.

FURTHER ORDERED: Request for Attorneys' Fees (Appellants Neville et al) = CONTINUED.

Chief Justice Brutinel did not participate in the determination of this matter.

Filing of a supplemental brief is permissive rather than mandatory. This order should not be construed as an invitation to repeat the contents of the Petition for Review, the Response, or any Reply. Lack of a supplemental brief shall not be considered an admission that the position of the opposing party or parties should prevail.

Counsel shall be advised of the date and time of oral argument at such time as the hearing date is determined.

The Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Division One, Phoenix, shall forward the remaining record to the Clerk of the Supreme Court.

Tracie K. Lindeman, Clerk

TO:

Stephen W Tully

Bradley L Dunn

Jared L Sutton

Amy M Wood

Hon Pamela S Gates

Hon Jeff Fine

Raymond L Billotte

Hon Joseph C Welty

Hon Danielle J Viola

jd

ROBERT BRUTINEL Chief Justice