Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LACHANCE et al v COUNTY OF COCHISE et al
MINUTES
ORDERED; Cochise County's “Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review” ” GRANTED.
FURTHER ORDERED: Cross Petition for Review - DENIED.
FURTHER ORDERED; Motion to Intervene of Arizona Secretary of Slate Adrian Fontes and Cochise County Sheriff Mark Dannels = DENIED.
FURTHER ORDERED; Request for Attorneys’ Fees (Appellants Lachance, et al.) = DENIED.
FURTHER ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend its Response to County Defendants' Petition for Review & its Cross Petition. And Plaintiffs' Reply to Cochise County's Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Request for Attorneys’ Fees - DENIED as moot.
FURTHER ORDERED: the court of appeals’ opinion in this case shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CV-24-0150-PR
Decided: February 11, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Arizona,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)