Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jose VALENZUELA v. STATE of Arkansas.
Appellant Jose Valenzuela, by and through his attorney, Ralph J. Blagg, has filed a motion to file belated appeal. Appellant Valenzuela retained Ralph J. Blagg to represent him on pending charges in the Circuit Court of Crawford County, Arkansas. After Valenzuela was convicted and was sentenced to twenty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction, attorney Blagg notified Valenzuela, by certified letter, that he had thirty days to appeal. Blagg further advised Valenzuela that if he wished to appeal, he should contact another attorney to file the appeal. Attorney Blagg did not petition the trial court to be relieved as counsel. Ark. R.Crim. P. 16 (2000). Appellant Valenzuela then retained another attorney, who filed the transcript one day late. Attorney Blagg was not contacted about this case by appellant or anyone on his behalf until the clerk of the Supreme Court contacted him and advised him that he was still the attorney of record and the transcript in the case had been tendered one day late. Attorney Blagg filed a motion to file a belated appeal.
This court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). We have also held that a statement that it was someone else's fault, or no one's fault, will not suffice. Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, petitioner's motion must be denied. Appellant's attorney shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript, and upon filing the same the motion will be granted.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. CR 03-373.
Decided: May 01, 2003
Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)