Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Frederick Dwayne MASON, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
A Pulaski County jury found appellant, Fredrick Dwayne Mason, guilty of two counts of aggravated robbery, theft of property, and second-degree battery. He was sentenced to a term of 660 months' imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. His appointed counsel, Danny R. Williams, filed a motion to withdraw on the grounds that the appeal is wholly without merit. Although this no-merit appeal is before us for a second time, Mr. Williams has again filed a brief that is not in compliance with the decision in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals.
In an unpublished opinion dated January 14, 2009, we ordered rebriefing because counsel had neither abstracted nor discussed several adverse rulings. In the interest of justice and timeliness, we now specifically direct counsel to pages 122-23, 156, 207, and 230-31 of the record. Why counsel failed to comply with Anders v. California and our prior orders of rebriefing in this case is unclear. The consequence of once again ignoring our mandate is not. If Mr. Williams does not file a conforming brief, we will consider appointing Myers new appellate counsel and reporting Mr. Williams to the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct.
Rebriefing is ordered, allowing Myers's counsel an additional thirty days in which to file a substituted brief, abstract, and addendum and cure any and all deficiencies. Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3). Mr. Williams's motion to withdraw as counsel is denied.
Rebriefing ordered.
LARRY D. VAUGHT, Chief Judge.
PITTMAN and GLADWIN, JJ., agree.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. CA CR 08-408.
Decided: July 01, 2009
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)