MITCHELL v. MITCHELL (2007)

Court of Appeals of Arkansas.

Susan Marie MITCHELL, Appellant, v. Timothy Gene MITCHELL, Appellee.

No. CA 06-578.

Decided: February 14, 2007

Peel Law Firm, by: Jennifer L. Modersohn, Russellville, AR, for appellant. Laws & Murdoch, P.A., by: Allen Laws, Russellville, AR, for appellee.

Susan Marie Mitchell appeals the Circuit Court's December 2005 order on various post-divorce disputes. We dismiss her appeal without prejudice for lack of an appealable order. In its order, the Circuit Court reserved a ruling on whether Timothy Gene Mitchell owed child support based on a stock option he allegedly received. Because the order did not resolve all the disputed issues, and the circuit court did not certify it pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the order is not final and we lack jurisdiction to review it. Ark. R.App. P.-Civ. 2(a); Hambay v. Williams, 335 Ark. 352, 353, 980 S.W.2d 263, 264 (1998).

Dismissed without prejudice.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network