Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ex parte Zamir Princeton Jones (IN RE: State of Alabama v. Zamir Princeton Jones)
Zamir Princeton Jones filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting this Court to direct Jefferson Circuit Judge Alaric May to set aside his December 11, 2022, order denying Jones's motion seeking to have the indictment pending against him dismissed based upon his claim of immunity from prosecution pursuant to § 13A-3-23(d), Ala. Code 1975, and to grant the. Jones is charged with murder in the shooting death of Christian Smith.
This petition is not timely. A petition for writ of mandamus must be filed within a presumptively reasonable time, which, in this case, is within 42 days from the date of the order that is the subject of this petition. See Rule 21(a), Ala. R. App. P. The order that is the subject of this petition was issued on December 11, 2022, but this petition was not filed until March 28, 2023 – some 107 days later. In his petition, Jones asserts that, after the hearing on his motion for immunity, he filed a request for extraordinary expenses to obtain a copy of the transcript of the hearing and that, due to a backlog, it took quite some time to receive the transcript. Jones thus implicitly argues that the reason for this delay provides good cause for this Court to consider this petition, notwithstanding that it was filed beyond the presumptively reasonable time.
The court reporter's delay in preparing the transcript does not constitute good cause for this Court to consider the petition. Jones should have filed the petition within the presumptively reasonable time and simultaneously moved this Court to allow him to supplement the petition with the transcript once the transcript had been certified. He did not do so. Accordingly, this petition for a writ of mandamus is due to be, and is hereby, dismissed.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM.
Windom, P.J., and Kellum, McCool, and Minor, JJ., concur. Cole, J., concurs in the result.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CR-2023-0229
Decided: June 23, 2023
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)