Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Henry Roger JONES, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama.
The appellant, Henry Roger Jones, Jr., was indicted for capital murder, felony-murder, murder, and first-degree burglary. He was convicted of felony-murder, a violation of § 13A-6-2(a)(3), Ala.Code 1975, and first-degree burglary, a violation of § 13A-7-5, Ala.Code 1975. The trial court sentenced him to serve concurrent terms of life in prison on the felony-murder conviction and twenty-five years in prison on the first-degree burglary conviction. In an unpublished memorandum that is being released today, we affirm as to the issues the appellant raises in his brief to this court. See Jones v. State, (CR-06-0630, December 21, 2007) --- So.2d ---- (Ala.Crim.App.2007) (table). In this opinion, we address the propriety of his convictions for both felony-murder and burglary.
In this case, the appellant was convicted of both felony-murder and first-degree burglary. However, the same burglary formed the basis for the felony-murder conviction and the first-degree burglary conviction. Therefore, the appellant's convictions for both felony-murder and first-degree burglary violate double jeopardy principles. See Edwards v. State, 907 So.2d 1077 (Ala.Crim.App.2004); Harris v. State, 854 So.2d 145 (Ala.Crim.App.2002); Peterson v. State, 842 So.2d 734 (Ala.Crim.App.2001). Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court with instructions that that court vacate the appellant's conviction and sentence for first-degree burglary. The trial court shall take all necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the earliest possible time and within 42 days after the release of this opinion.
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM IN PART; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.*
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. Note from the reporter of decisions: On March 21, 2008, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion.
BASCHAB, Presiding Judge.
McMILLAN, WISE, and WELCH, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs in the result.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CR-06-0630.
Decided: December 21, 2007
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)