Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jack Till GAINES v. STATE.
Jack Till Gaines's probation was revoked. At the conclusion of the revocation proceedings, the trial court resentenced Gaines to a more severe punishment than that originally imposed. Gaines appeals from the trial court's order imposing a more severe sentence.
Gaines was originally sentenced to three years in the penitentiary. This sentence was suspended and Gaines was ordered to serve three years on supervised probation. The trial court, after determining that Gaines had violated the conditions of his probation, sentenced him to five years in the penitentiary. This sentence was split, and he was ordered to serve two years in the penitentiary, followed by four years on supervised probation. “The general rule is that ‘it is not within the power of the court to increase a sentence when punishment has already been suffered under the original sentence.’ ” Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 1382 (Ala.Cr.App.1979) (citations omitted).
The State of Alabama has filed a motion asking us to remand the case, stating that the trial court had inadvertently increased Gaines's sentence after revoking his probation. The State suggested that the trial court might have jurisdiction to correct the sentence under Rule 29, Ala.R.Crim.P., but requested that we remand the case to pretermit any possible jurisdictional questions.
This case is remanded for proper sentencing consistent with this opinion. Remand should be made to this court within 49 days from release of this opinion.
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS AS TO SENTENCING.*
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. Note from reporter of decisions: On August 22, 1997, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion.
COBB, Judge.
All the Judges concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CR-96-0999.
Decided: July 03, 1997
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)