Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael SMITH v. STATE.
In a separate unpublished memorandum, we are today affirming Michael Smith's convictions for one count of unlawful distribution of cocaine, two counts of assault in the second degree, and two counts of assault in the third degree. Smith was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for the conviction for the unlawful distribution of cocaine. That sentence included an additional 10 years' imprisonment, imposed pursuant to the enhancement provisions of §§ 13A-12-250 and -270, Ala.Code 1975, because the sale occurred within a three-mile radius of a school and within a three-mile radius of a public housing project. However, Smith correctly argues that the State failed to give him notice of its intent to invoke the enhancement provisions of §§ 13A-12-250 and -270. Prior notice by the State is required before the enhancement provisions of §§ 13A-12-250 and -270 may be applied. See, e.g., Stevens v. State, 659 So.2d 990, 990 (Ala.Crim.App.1994); and Cunny v. State, 629 So.2d 693, 696 (Ala.Crim.App.1993).
Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court with directions for that court to hold a new sentencing hearing with respect to Smith's conviction for the unlawful distribution of cocaine. Due return should be filed with this court no later than 28 days from the date of this opinion.
AFFIRMED BY MEMORANDUM AS TO CONVICTIONS AND AS TO SENTENCES FOR ASSAULT * ; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS AS TO SENTENCING ON UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTION CONVICTION.**
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. Note from the reporter of decisions: This case will also appear on a table of decisions without opinions.
FOOTNOTE. Note from the reporter of decisions: On February 23, 2001, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion.
LONG, Presiding Judge.
McMILLAN, COBB, BASCHAB, and FRY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CR-99-0780.
Decided: December 22, 2000
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)