SHINABERRY v. WILSON (2020)

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Sandra SHINABERRY v. Mark WILSON, as guardian ad litem for G.G., H.G., N.P., and S.P., minors

2180359

Decided: November 05, 2020

Paul A. Miller and Patrick W. Franklin of Miller, Christie & Kinney, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant. Joshua D. Arnold of Ellis, Head, Owens, Justice & Arnold, Columbiana, for appellee.

On Remand from Alabama Supreme Court

This court affirmed, without an opinion, the judgment of the Shelby Circuit Court (“the trial court”) awarding a fee to Mark Wilson, a guardian ad litem appointed to represent G.G., H.G., N.P. and S.P. Shinaberry v. Wilson (No. 2180359, Aug. 9, 2019), 307 So. 3d 548 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019) (table). This court's judgment has been reversed, and the cause has been remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Shinaberry, [Ms. 1180935, July 31, 2020] 326 So. 3d 1037 (Ala. 2020). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed, and the cause is remanded for the trial court “to reconsider the amount of reasonable and necessary fees” to be awarded to Wilson, in his capacity as guardian ad litem for G.G., H.G., N.P., and S.P., in accordance with the supreme court's opinion. 326 So. 3d at 1043.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

EDWARDS, Judge.

Thompson, P.J., and Moore, Donaldson, and Hanson, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network