Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION v. BROOKWOOD HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Brookwood Health Services, Inc. v. HealthSouth Corporation.
Brookwood Health Services, Inc., filed a petition for judicial review in the Montgomery Circuit Court, against the State Health Planning and Development Agency (“SHPDA”) and HealthSouth Corporation. The circuit court entered a judgment reversing SHPDA's decision on September 2, 1999. HealthSouth filed a postjudgment motion on September 30, 1999. On December 29, 1999, pursuant to Rule 59.1, Ala. R. Civ. P., HealthSouth filed a consent to extend the time for the circuit court to rule on HealthSouth's postjudgment motion, to January 17, 2000. On February 3, 2000, Brookwood filed a “Notice of Consent for Additional Time,” stating that it had consented to the extension as stated by HealthSouth on December 29, 1999. The trial court never ruled on the postjudgment motion, and HealthSouth filed a notice of appeal on February 15, 2000. Brookwood filed a cross-appeal on March 1, 2000.
We conclude that the appeal and the cross-appeal are untimely. Rule 59.1 provides that a postjudgment motion will be denied by operation of law 90 days after it is filed “unless with the express consent of all the parties, which consent shall appear of record” (emphasis added). The record contains no consent by SHPDA to the extension. Also, Brookwood's consent did not “appear of record” until February 3, 2000, after the 90 days had elapsed.
Because SHPDA never consented to the extension and because Brookwood's consent was provided late, the trial court's judgment was denied by operation of law on December 29, 1999, the 90th day after the September 30, 1999, judgment. The time for HealthSouth to file its notice of appeal expired on February 9, 2000, the 42nd day after December 29, 1999. See Rule 4(a)(1), Ala. R.App. P. Therefore, HealthSouth's February 15, 2000, notice of appeal is untimely. Brookwood's March 1, 2000, cross-appeal is also untimely. See Rule 4(a)(2), Ala. R.App. P. (providing that a cross-appeal must be filed within 14 days of a timely notice of appeal, or within 42 days of the trial court's judgment).
APPEALS DISMISSED.
CRAWLEY, Judge.
ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, J., concur. YATES, J., concurs in the result. THOMPSON, J., recuses himself.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2990511.
Decided: August 18, 2000
Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)