Grover B. MONTGOMERY and Eleanor H. Montgomery, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Carl SULLIVAN et al., Defendants, Arthur B. Sirl, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant.
This case involves the same issues as the case of Puckett v. Sullivan, Cal.App., 12 P.2d 55. Although the two cases were tried separately and decided by different judges, the only factual difference of any significance is that the Montgomery property is farther removed from the area of the cut than the Puckett property. Both appellant and respondents agree that this court's decision in the Puckett case will control the decision in the instant case.
For the reasons set forth in Puckett v. Sullivan, supra, the judgment is affirmed.
VAN DYKE, P. J., and PEEK, J., concur.