TANNENBAUM v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CITY COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Reset A A Font size: Print

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

Ex parte TANNENBAUM. Ex parte BROWN. TANNENBAUM v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO.

BROWN v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO.

Cr. 2900, 2901; 15673 and 15674.

Decided: January 16, 1953

John P. Golden, San Francisco, for petitioner Joseph tannenbaum. Leslie C. Gillen, San Francisco, Sol. A. Abrams, San Francisco, for petitioner Carl E. Brown.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 245 P.2d 633, applying Stats. of 1871, p. 319, was not here violated. See generally In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82, 59 P.2d 213; United States v. Price, C.C., 163 F. 904. We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184, 187 P.2d 741. The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.

PETERS, Presiding Justice.