RYAN v. GEIGER

Reset A A Font size: Print

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

RYAN v. GEIGER, Director of Health.

Civ. 10031.

Decided: October 09, 1936

Eric Lyders, of San Francisco, for appellant. John J. O'Toole, City Atty., and Thomas P. Slevin, Deputy City Atty., both of San Francisco, for respondent.

The plaintiff commenced a proceeding asking for a writ of mandamus directing the defendant as director of health to issue to the plaintiff a permit to conduct a stable. The court made findings in favor of the defendant. From the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff appealed. The judgment so appealed from was entered April 23, 1935. The judgment was entered March 20, 1935, in the case entitled People of the State of California v. Ryan (Cal.App.) 61 P.(2d) 360, this day filed. By reason of the conclusion which we have reached in the case cited, all questions involved in the instant case have become moot. Therefore the appeal should be dismissed. 2 Cal.Jur. 123.

It is so ordered.

STURTEVANT, Justice.

We concur: NOURSE, P. J.; SPENCE, J.

Copied to clipboard