McCLINTOCK v. ROBINSON

Reset A A Font size: Print

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

McCLINTOCK v. ROBINSON.

Civ. 1638.

Decided: July 16, 1936

Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy, of Santa Ana, for appellant. L. E. Dadmun, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

Respondent filed his motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant had not filed his opening brief within the time provided by law. Subsequent to the filing of the motion, but before the hearing thereof, appellant had served and filed his opening brief.

On the authority of Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd. (Cal.App.) 58 P.(2d) 665, the motion is denied.

TURRENTINE, Justice pro tem.

We concur: BARNARD, P. J.; MARKS, J.

Copied to clipboard