IN RE: the Application of Earl AMBROSE

Reset A A Font size: Print

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

IN RE: the Application of Earl AMBROSE, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Cr. 305.

Decided: December 14, 1934

Harry Pransky and James M. Carter, both of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Earl Redwine, Dist. Atty., of Riverside, for respondent.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. With the exception of the name of the petitioner, the essential facts herein are identical with those appearing in the case of In re Salas (Cal. App.) 38 P.(2d) 806, this day decided. For the reasons therein given, a similar order should be entered herein.

The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded.

BARNARD, Presiding Justice.

We concur: MARKS, J.; JENNINGS, J.