• FindLaw
  • Caselaw
  • California
  • CA Ct. App.
  • ROSSLOW PETITIONER v. MULCREVY CLERK OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RESPONDENT

ROSSLOW PETITIONER v. MULCREVY CLERK OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RESPONDENT

Reset A A Font size: Print

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

A. F. ROSSLOW, PETITIONER, v. H. I. MULCREVY, CLERK OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, RESPONDENT.

Civ. 9358.

Decided: January 29, 1934

H. C. Burnhill and Francis Gill, of San Francisco, for petitioner. Frank V. Kington, of San Francisco, for respondent.

Petition for mandate to compel respondent to issue execution on a judgment.

The facts are stated in the opinion in Rosslow v. Janssen (Cal. App.) 29 P. (2d) 287, this day decided. Upon the authority of that case, the petition is denied.

TYLER, Presiding Justice.

We concur: KNIGHT, J.; CASHIN, J.