IN RE: HARRIS' ESTATE.†

Reset A A Font size: Print

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

IN RE: HARRIS' ESTATE.† HARRIS et al. v. LARTER et al.

Civ. 1663.

Decided: March 16, 1937

W. M. Greathouse and C. E. McDowell, both of Los Angeles, and Head, Wellington & Jacobs and Otto A. Jacobs, all of Santa Ana, for appellants. R. Y. Williams and Charles D. Swanner, both of Santa Ana, for respondents.

In a petition for rehearing the appellants refer to the statement in the opinion that the court had found that eight parcels of real property were acquired by Mrs. Harris after the death of her husband, and state that the finding in question refers to seven parcels only and that this court has mistakenly included “parcel 3” in the real property thus acquired by Mrs. Harris. While the finding referred to covers eight pieces of property, it does not mention “parcel 3” and that parcel was not specially considered in the opinion since no point was raised in connection therewith.

The petition for a rehearing is denied.

PER CURIAM.

Copied to clipboard