PAUL MARTIN DAVIS MILLER v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Reset A A Font size: Print

Court of Appeal, Second District, California.

PAUL MARTIN DAVIS–MILLER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

_ AMY REED, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

B224318 c/w B224320

Decided: October 26, 2011

Audet & Partners and Joshua C. Ezrin for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps and John T. Brooks for Defendant and Respondent.

We Concur:

Filed 11/22/11

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PAUL MARTIN DAVIS–MILLER et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

AMY REED,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

B224318

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC398608)

B224320

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC418712)

ORDER (1) MODIFYING OPINION;  AND (2) CERTIFYING OPINION FOR PUBLICATION

The opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on October 26, 2011 (the Opinion) is modified in the following manner:

1. On page 19, line 19, the words, “petn. for review filed June 1, 2011,” are deleted so the sentence reads:  “(Knapp v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc. (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 932, 945 (Knapp );  see also Pfizer, supra, 182 Cal.App.4th at p. 632.)”

The opinion was not certified for publication in the Official Reports.   A request for publication was filed on November 14, 2011, by the firm of Mayer Brown on behalf of their client American Honda Motor Co., Inc. For good cause it now appears that the opinion should be

There is no change in the judgment.

CROSKEY, J.

KLEIN, P. J. KITCHING, J.