FOLLETTE v. COMACHO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FOLLETTE v. COMACHO, (1970)

No. 1394

Argued:     Decided: June 1, 1970

Certiorari granted; 421 F.2d 822, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 .

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/398/279.html">398 U.S. 279 </a> (1970) 398 U.S. 279 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, 398 U.S. 279 (1970)

398 U.S. 279

HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 1183, Misc.
Decided June 1, 1970

Certiorari granted; 416 F.2d 406, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 .

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [398 U.S. 279, 280]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More