MAINE v. SHONE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BRADESKU v. BRADESKU, (1969)

No. 238

Argued:     Decided: October 13, 1969

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

A. Albert Perelman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


MAINE v. SHONE, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/396/6.html">396 U.S. 6 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 6 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MAINE v. SHONE, 396 U.S. 6 (1969)

396 U.S. 6

MAINE ET AL. v. SHONE
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 261.
Decided October 13, 1969

District Court judgment and 406 F.2d 844, vacated and remanded.

James S. Erwin, Attorney General of Maine, and John W. Benoit, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and the United States District Court for the District of Maine are vacated and the case is remanded to said United States District Court with directions to dismiss the case as moot. [396 U.S. 6, 7]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More