BLINCOE v. WATSON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MOSKOWITZ v. POWER, (1970)

No. 770

Argued:     Decided: January 19, 1970

Appeal dismissed.

Daniel G. Collins for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, pro se, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Philip Kahaner and Robert S. Hammer, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee the Attorney General of New York.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BLINCOE v. WATSON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/396/373.html">396 U.S. 373 </a> (1970) 396 U.S. 373 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BLINCOE v. WATSON, 396 U.S. 373 (1970)

396 U.S. 373

BLINCOE ET UX. v. WATSON, ASSESSOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 808.
Decided January 19, 1970

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [396 U.S. 373, 374]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More