LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

IN RE REED, (1970)

No. 706

Argued:     Decided: January 12, 1970

___ Del. ___, 257 A. 2d 382, appeal dismissed.

Warren B. Burt for appellant.

David P. Buckson, Attorney General, and Ruth M. Ferrell, State Solicitor, for the State of Delaware.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/396/274.html">396 U.S. 274 </a> (1970) 396 U.S. 274 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)

396 U.S. 274

LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 715.
Decided January 12, 1970

271 Cal. App. 2d 774, 76 Cal. Rptr. 869, appeal dismissed.

Randal F. Dickey, Jr., and Robert L. McCarty for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Harold B. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. Power, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [396 U.S. 274, 275]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More