ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

KING v. GREENBLATT, (1969)

No. 615

Argued:     Decided: November 10, 1969

Affirmed.

Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/396/26.html">396 U.S. 26 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 26 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 26 (1969)

396 U.S. 26

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 686, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969

41 Wis. 2d 497, 164 N. W. 2d 512, appeal dismissed.

Anthony G. Amsterdam, Michael Meltsner, and Melvyn Zarr for appellant.

Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Sverre O. Tinglum, and William F. Eich, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [396 U.S. 26, 27]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More