MATHIS v. NELSON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD., (1969)

No. 593

Argued:     Decided: December 8, 1969

301 F. Supp. 103, affirmed.

Marshall Patner for appellants.

Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MATHIS v. NELSON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/396/114.html">396 U.S. 114 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 114 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MATHIS v. NELSON, 396 U.S. 114 (1969)

396 U.S. 114

MATHIS v. NELSON, WARDEN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 620, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969

70 Cal. 2d 467, 450 P.2d 290, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [396 U.S. 114, 115]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More