PERK v. OHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

PERK v. OHIO, (1969)

No. 590

Argued:     Decided: December 8, 1969

19 Ohio St. 2d 1, 249 N. E. 2d 525, appeal dismissed.

Gerald A. Donahue and Donald M. Robiner for appellant.

John T. Corrigan, pro se, and John L. Dowling for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT v. CAPITAL ELEC. POW. ASSN., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/396/113.html">396 U.S. 113 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 113 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT v. CAPITAL ELEC. POW. ASSN., 396 U.S. 113 (1969)

396 U.S. 113

MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO. v. CAPITAL ELECTRIC POWER ASSN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
No. 611.
Decided December 8, 1969

222 So.2d 399, appeal dismissed.

Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, Sherwood W. Wise, Garner W. Green, and Joshua Green for appellant.

T. Harvey Hedgepeth for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [396 U.S. 113, 114]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More