MOYA v. DEBACA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MOYA v. DeBACA, (1969)

No. 996

Argued:     Decided: June 23, 1969

286 F. Supp. 606, appeal dismissed.

William G. Fitzpatrick, Jr., for appellants.

Claud S. Mann for DeBaca et al., and Boston E. Witt, Attorney General, and James V. Noble, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would vacate the judgment and remand the case in light of Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, ante, p. 337.


DILLARD v. FAMILY COURT, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/395/825.html">395 U.S. 825 </a> (1969) 395 U.S. 825 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DILLARD v. FAMILY COURT, 395 U.S. 825 (1969)

395 U.S. 825

DILLARD v. FAMILY COURT, QUEENS COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1939, Misc.
Decided June 23, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [395 U.S. 825, 826]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More