PRONER v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

PRONER v. UNITED STATES, (1969)

No. 1022

Argued:     Decided: June 23, 1969

Certiorari granted; 405 F.2d 943, vacated and remanded.

Harris B. Steinberg for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Benton v. Maryland, ante, p. 784.


ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/395/823.html">395 U.S. 823 </a> (1969) 395 U.S. 823 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, 395 U.S. 823 (1969)

395 U.S. 823

ANDERSON ET AL. v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. No. 1414.
Decided June 23, 1969.

436 S. W. 2d 533, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Michael Avedisian for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [395 U.S. 823, 824]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More