STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BISENIUS v. KARNS, (1969)

No. 1357

Argued:     Decided: June 16, 1969

42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 N. W. 2d 377, appeal dismissed.

S. A. Schapiro for appellant.

Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Albert Harriman and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/395/709.html">395 U.S. 709 </a> (1969) 395 U.S. 709 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, 395 U.S. 709 (1969)

395 U.S. 709

STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 208, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 706, 794; 234 N. E. 2d 698, 235 N. E. 2d 456, vacated and remanded.

William Cahn for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . [395 U.S. 709, 710]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More