JONES v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

RAMM v. RAMM, (1969)

No. 1294

Argued:     Decided: June 9, 1969

22 N. Y. 2d 926, 242 N. E. 2d 88, appeal dismissed.

Norman Ramm, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


JONES v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/395/462.html">395 U.S. 462 </a> (1969) 395 U.S. 462 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JONES v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 462 (1969)

395 U.S. 462

JONES v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 966, Misc.
Decided June 9, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 400 F.2d 134, vacated and remanded.

Edward L. Cragen for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165 . [395 U.S. 462, 463]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More