ROBINSON v. JOHNSON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ROBINSON v. JOHNSON, (1969)

No. 67

Argued:     Decided: May 5, 1969

Affirmed.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, and Daniel P. Coman for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655. [394 U.S. 847, 848]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More