MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES, (1969)

No. 880

Argued:     Decided: April 1, 1969

Certiorari granted; 402 F.2d 836, vacated and remanded.

Gregory S. Stout for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kossack, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, ante, p. 165.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.


NICKOLICH v. OHIO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/454.html">394 U.S. 454 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 454 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NICKOLICH v. OHIO, 394 U.S. 454 (1969)

394 U.S. 454

NICKOLICH v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1052.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

E. Raymond Morehart for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [394 U.S. 454, 455]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More