IN RE GROSS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

IN RE GROSS, (1969)

No. 1035

Argued:     Decided: March 24, 1969

Appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey, and Michael T. Sauer for the State of California.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/321.html">394 U.S. 321 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 321 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

394 U.S. 321

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACHINERY CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1069.
Decided March 24, 1969.

41 Ill. 2d 64, 241 N. E. 2d 857, appeal dismissed.

Harry H. Ruskin for appellant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [394 U.S. 321, 322]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More