WOODS v. CALIFORNIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WOODS v. CALIFORNIA, (1969)

No. 1006

Argued:     Decided: March 24, 1969

Appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOEING CO. v. HAMM, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/320.html">394 U.S. 320 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 320 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOEING CO. v. HAMM, 394 U.S. 320 (1969)

394 U.S. 320

BOEING CO. v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 1017.
Decided March 24, 1969.

283 Ala. 310, 216 So.2d 288, appeal dismissed.

John Bingham for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and William H. Burton, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [394 U.S. 320, 321]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More