SHAW v. ILLINOIS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SHAW v. ILLINOIS, (1969)

No. 665

Argued:     Decided: March 10, 1969

Certiorari granted; 89 Ill. App. 2d 285, 233 N. E. 2d 73, vacated and remanded.

Gerald W. Getty and Marshall J. Hartman for petitioner.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, for further consideration in light of Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


WATTS v. MARYLAND, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/214.html">394 U.S. 214 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 214 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATTS v. MARYLAND, 394 U.S. 214 (1969)

394 U.S. 214

WATTS v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1267, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [394 U.S. 214, 215]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More