HORNBEAK v. HAMM

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD, (1968)

No. 85

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1968

280 F. Supp. 406, affirmed.

E. N. Zeigler for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.


HORNBEAK v. HAMM, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/9.html">393 U.S. 9 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 9 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HORNBEAK v. HAMM, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)

393 U.S. 9

HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA. No. 260.
Decided October 14, 1968.

283 F. Supp. 549, affirmed.

Barry Hess for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and Herbert I. Burson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWARD are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument. [393 U.S. 9, 10]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More