LAKE v. POTOMAC LIGHT & POWER CO.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LAKE v. POTOMAC LIGHT & POWER CO., (1968)

No. 364

Argued:     Decided: October 21, 1968

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


DYMYTRYSHYN v. ESPERDY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/77.html">393 U.S. 77 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 77 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DYMYTRYSHYN v. ESPERDY, 393 U.S. 77 (1968)

393 U.S. 77

DYMYTRYSHYN ET AL. v.
ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 380.
Decided October 21, 1968.

285 F. Supp. 507, affirmed.

John J. Abt for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [393 U.S. 77, 78]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More