TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DUNCAN v. INDIANA, (1969)

No. 110

Argued:     Decided: February 24, 1969

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374.


TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/533.html">393 U.S. 533 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 533 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT, 393 U.S. 533 (1969)

393 U.S. 533

TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 57, Misc.
Decided February 24, 1969.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374. [393 U.S. 533, 534]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More