BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SUTTON v. ADAMS, (1969)

No. 726

Argued:     Decided: January 20, 1969

212 So.2d 1, appeal dismissed.

Milton E. Grusmark for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, pro se, and Robert A. Chastain and Wilson W. Wright, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.


BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/404.html">393 U.S. 404 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 404 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, 393 U.S. 404 (1969)

393 U.S. 404

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 852.
Decided January 20, 1969.

292 F. Supp. 851, affirmed.

Jerome M. Kay for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [393 U.S. 404, 405]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More