ESTRIN v. MOSS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ESTRIN v. MOSS, (1969)

No. 684

Argued:     Decided: January 13, 1969

221 Tenn. 657, 430 S. W. 2d 345, appeal dismissed.

Robert W. Healy for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


WARD v. JOHNSON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/318.html">393 U.S. 318 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 318 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WARD v. JOHNSON, 393 U.S. 318 (1969)

393 U.S. 318

WARD ET AL. v. JOHNSON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 703.
Decided January 13, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [393 U.S. 318, 319]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More