BENNETT v. COTTINGHAM

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FREED v. BALDI, (1969)

No. 652

Argued:     Decided: January 13, 1969

___ Colo. ___, 443 P.2d 716, appeal dismissed.

George Louis Creamer for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BENNETT v. COTTINGHAM, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/317.html">393 U.S. 317 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 317 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BENNETT v. COTTINGHAM, 393 U.S. 317 (1969)

393 U.S. 317

BENNETT ET AL. v. COTTINGHAM ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 665.
Decided January 13, 1969.

290 F. Supp. 759, affirmed.

Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, Melvyn Zarr, Oscar W. Adams, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam for appellants.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, pro se, and Robert P. Bradley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [393 U.S. 317, 318]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More