MUNIZ v. BETO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ANDERSEN v. FLORIDA, (1968)

No. 335

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1968

208 So.2d 814, appeal dismissed.

William Y. Akerman for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


MUNIZ v. BETO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/22.html">393 U.S. 22 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 22 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MUNIZ v. BETO, 393 U.S. 22 (1968)

393 U.S. 22

MUNIZ v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 430, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Joseph A. Calamia for appellant.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Flowers and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, and W. Barton Boling for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [393 U.S. 22, 23]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More